Canada's $1 Trillion Grid Gamble: AI, EVs and the Race to Stay Powered
Every week on The Sanity Project, we bring a rigorous Critical thinking lens to the current events shaping Canada. In this episode, we cut through the noise of partisan bickering and break down the trillion-dollar plan to double Canada’s electrical grid—a story swamped by spin and alarmism online. If you need a news breakdown you can trust, packed with clarity and context, tune in for our deep dive into one of the year’s biggest policy announcements.
To subscribe to our free weekly newsletter, go to https://thesanity.org/subscribe
The Math Behind Powering Canada Strong: A Deep Political Analysis Unraveling Canada's Grid ExpansionGet clear-eyed news commentary as we sift fact from fiction in today’s Canadian news landscape. This episode offers a pragmatic primer on the nuts and bolts behind Canada’s most ambitious infrastructure vision—without the outrage culture or clickbait.
Dissecting Canadian Politics: Liberals, Conservatives, and Energy PolicyWe challenge media misinformation with robust critical thinking, highlighting competing narratives from both progressive politics advocates and critics on the right. PM Carney’s Liberal government is betting big on electrification, while opposition leaders decry “skyrocketing” hydro bills. Who’s right? Where does the real math lead us?
Separating Fact from SpinOur political commentary explores how federal democratic limits, workforce shortages, and constitutional wrangling over electricity left the new plan just a “vision”—not yet robust policy. We give listeners the full news analysis so you can critique the headlines, not just consume them.
Stay up to date on daily news, unpack Canada’s policy tensions, and sharpen your own critical thinking about politics and current events with The Sanity Project.
To never miss an episode, subscribe to this podcast wherever you are listening
Sources Used In This Episode
https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-sources/electricity-infrastructure/powering-canada-strong-national-strategy-electrified-canadian-economy
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/carney-clean-energy-regulations-announcement-9.7198953
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-ottawa-canada-grid-capacity-expansion-electricity-strategy-2050/
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/canada-unveils-plan-double-capacity-electricity-grid-by-2050-2026-05-14/
https://globalnews.ca/news/11849175/carney-clean-electricity-strategy/
Canada is preparing for a trillion-dollar rebuild of its electricity grid.
The question is no longer whether demand is coming.
It's whether the country can build fast enough to meet it.
Hi, I'm Beau Kaufman and this is The Sanity Project.
Tonight's deep dive focuses on the federal plan to expand the Canada electricity grid,
a massive infrastructure project tied to AI growth, EV adoption, industrial electrification,
and Canada's long-term economic future.
Supporters see a nation-building strategy.
Critics see another political vision without a binding implementation plan.
Rachel Bennett and Michael Reeves examine the numbers, the politics, the natural gas
debate, and the growing pressure on Canada's electricity system.
Their findings are far more nuanced than the public debate suggests.
Let's listen to their discussion.
Imagine opening your phone today and just seeing two entirely different realities playing
out on your screen.
Oh, yeah.
It is a total mess out there today.
Right.
Like on one side of your feed, you have people absolutely furious sharing articles claiming
the country is being sold out to fossil fuel interests.
They're calling it this massive betrayal of our climate goals.
And then you scroll down just, you know, one or two posts and it's the exact opposite.
Exactly.
The other half of your feed is insisting that a radical green agenda is about to hike your
electricity bill by like 35% and plunge the country into darkness.
I mean, it is the absolute definition of political whiplash.
If you try to consume the news today, you are essentially being asked to choose which
apocalypse you want to believe in.
And right at the dead center of this storm is what happened today.
Announcement: Powering Canada Strong
Today is May 14th, 2026.
And Prime Minister Mark Carney just announced the federal government's brand new Powering
Canada Strong National Electricity Strategy.
Yeah.
And we are talking about a massive $1 trillion plan.
The goal is to completely double Canada's grid capacity by the year 2050.
Which is huge.
But the political noise surrounding this has been deafening from the very second the press
release dropped.
Oh, absolutely.
You've got interest groups, politicians, social media influencers, just immediately
weaponizing the document to fit whatever narrative they were already pushing yesterday.
Which is exactly why we are here.
Welcome to the Deep Dive.
If you're listening to this, our mission today is very simple.
We are going to cut straight through that extreme political rhetoric.
We have to.
Yeah.
We're going to strip away the spin from both the political left and the political right
and just look at the actual unvarnished mechanics of what was announced today.
And to do that, we are pulling from a really solid stack of sources.
We've got the official Natural Resources Canada strategy document itself.
The heavy reading?
Right.
The actual text.
We are also relying really heavily on an incredible in-depth white paper that was just released
by the Sanity Project Research Desk, which fact checks the core claims.
And finally, we're bringing in some fantastic on the ground reporting and commentary from
global news to sort of, you know, ground this all in reality.
So we're going to divide and conquer this.
I'm going to anchor us to the verified facts and the raw math behind the policy.
Because as we'll see, the math of this situation is pretty undeniable.
And you are going to be our investigative skeptic.
I am ready for it.
My job is to stress test the claims, find the gaps in the proposal, and really push
on the underlying tensions here.
I mean, a trillion dollar vision sounds great in a press conference, but execution in the
real world is a completely different animal.
It really is.
So let's unpack the baseline first.
Why the Build Is Necessary — The Math of Demand
Before we can even touch the controversies, we have to understand where Canada actually
stands today.
Right.
Because the rhetoric makes it sound like we're starting from zero.
Exactly.
If you listen to either side, you'd think the national grid is either a polluting disaster
or just on the verge of total collapse.
But the facts, and these are verified by the OECD and the International Energy Agency,
they tell a completely different story.
Yeah.
Canada starts from a position of massive global strength.
We do.
Right now, our grid is already 80% non-emitting.
That is the second highest in the entire G7.
And that's a crucial piece of context that just gets lost.
That 80% figure is largely thanks to decades of legacy investments in huge hydro projects
and nuclear power.
We aren't starting from scratch here.
We really aren't.
And here's another statistic that gets completely buried right now.
Yeah.
Canada currently has the lowest residential electricity costs in the G7.
Wow.
Yeah.
And the second lowest industrial electricity costs.
That is the objective reality.
So when PM Carney steps up to a podium and announces a $1 trillion strategy to double
grid capacity by 2050, it is vital to understand that this is not some ideological pet project.
Right.
It's a structural response to a verified math problem.
Yes.
Demand Drivers: EVs, Heat Pumps & Industry
The math problem is the demand curve.
Electricity demand in Canada is going to double over the next couple of decades, regardless
of whether this specific federal plan exists or not.
And if we look at the mechanics of why that demand is soaring so fast, it comes down to
a massive societal shift.
Like right now, electricity only makes up about one fifth of Canada's total energy
use.
It's one fifth.
Yeah.
Just a fifth.
The other four fifths of the energy we consume relies heavily on direct combustion of fossil
fuels.
So gasoline burning in our cars, natural gas burning in our home furnaces, diesel running
heavy machinery.
Right.
I see.
So as the economy modernizes and decarbonizes, all of that direct combustion energy use just
shifts over to the electrical grid.
So we're talking about millions of electric vehicles plugging in at night.
We're talking about home heating, switching from gas furnaces to electric heat pumps.
Exactly.
And massive industrial growth, too, specifically the critical mineral sector needed for battery
supply chains that requires incredibly electro intensive smelting processes.
But those are the predictable factors, right?
Those are the things we've known were coming for a decade.
The wild card, the thing that has suddenly accelerated its timeline and basically forced
a trillion dollar strategy onto the table today is something else entirely.
Artificial intelligence.
Yep.
AI and data centers.
Yeah.
The strategy document points out that Canada is competing globally for what they call sovereign
AI infrastructure.
Sovereign AI.
Break that down for us.
Sure.
So for those unfamiliar, sovereign AI basically means countries and corporations wanting their
own massive domestic AI brains.
They want them hosted on their own soil so they aren't reliant on foreign servers or,
you know, vulnerable to international data laws.
Makes sense.
And tech giants are flocking to Canada because our cooler climate naturally helps reduce
the massive cooling requirements these giant data centers have.
But the power draw of these facilities is almost difficult to comprehend.
I was reading this brilliant analogy from McMaster University's Mike Welland in the
AI and Data Centres — ‘Microwave Seconds’ Analogy
Global News Reporting, and it just makes this so visceral.
Oh, the microwave seconds thing.
Yes.
He breaks the power draw down into what he calls microwave seconds.
I love this analogy.
Explain how it works.
Okay.
So think about running your standard microwave at home on high.
If you do a regular Google tech search, it takes about one to one and a half microwave
seconds of electricity to process that query on a server somewhere.
Okay.
So just a quick step.
Right.
But if you run a conversational AI query, like asking chat GPT a question, it jumps
to two to five microwave seconds.
Which individually doesn't sound catastrophic until you start multiplying it by billions
of queries.
Exactly.
And if you ask the AI to summarize a long document, you're looking at 10 seconds of
a microwave running.
Still, it's a lot, but manageable maybe.
But here's where the math gets truly terrifying for our grid operators.
If you ask an AI program to generate a brand new image, say a picture of a cat riding a
skateboard, the computing power required to create that single image equals running your
microwave for two full minutes.
Oh, wow.
Yeah.
That is enough electricity to physically boil a cup of water.
That is staggering.
Every single time someone generates a disposable AI image for a presentation or just a social
media post, it's the energy equivalent of boiling water.
Yep.
So if every search you make is boiling a cup of water, and these global tech giants are
building acres upon acres of these data centers in our backyard to handle that load, I mean,
our current grid does not stand a chance.
It has to double.
It really does.
But of course, if you are listening right now, you are probably thinking, ah, a trillion
dollars.
I can barely afford my grocery bill right now.
How on earth am I supposed to pay for a trillion dollar grid expansion?
Right.
That is exactly the right question to ask.
But the government's claim in the document is actually quite bold here.
Who Pays? The Energy Wallet Explained
They state that by 2050, seven in 10 households will actually pay less for their total energy
needs than they do today.
Which immediately sounds completely counterintuitive.
I mean, how do we spend a trillion dollars, double the size of the electrical system,
and somehow pay less?
It sounds like magic.
It does.
But they justify this using the concept of the energy wallet.
Okay.
What is that?
The energy wallet has all the money you spend to keep your life moving right now.
The gas you pump into your car, the natural gas bill for your furnace, and your monthly
hydro bill.
That total amount is your wallet.
Right.
In the future, the electricity slice of that pie is going to get much, much bigger.
But the total size of the pie shrinks.
Because of thermal efficiency, right?
Precisely.
Internal combustion engines and traditional gas furnaces are incredibly inefficient.
A huge percentage of the energy you pay for is literally just lost as waste heat.
Electric machines are generally two to four times more efficient.
Like an EV uses far more of the energy it consumes to actually move the wheels.
So while your household hydro bill might go up, your visits to the gas station disappear
entirely, making your total monthly energy costs lower.
Okay, so that is the raw math of the situation.
And I mean, it makes logical sense on paper.
But this is where I need you to step in and apply some serious pressure as our skeptic.
Never read.
Why don't you move from the math of the demand curve to the actual text of this policy document?
Natural Gas Debate & Baseload Reliability
You hit a massive tension point.
How does the government justify calling this a clean electricity strategy if they are actively
planning to build more natural gas plants?
Isn't that a total contradiction?
Yeah, this is our first major pushback.
And it is exactly what the political left and environmental advocacy groups are hammering
the government on today.
Right.
We saw that online.
Oh yeah.
The government and Clean Energy Canada have put out statements publicly arguing that natural
gas is dangerously overemphasized in this document at the expense of solar, wind and
battery renewables.
And if you look at the public reaction from environmentally conscious voters online, they
feel completely betrayed.
Absolutely.
One of the top comments on a massive Reddit thread this morning literally says, you are
increasing the use of fossil fuels.
That is not net zero.
It's greenwashing.
And honestly, it's a completely fair point to raise.
If the ultimate goal is a non-emitting grid, why is natural gas explicitly described in
the government's own strategy document as a central pillar?
Well, this is where we have to look closely at the mechanism of how power grids actually
function, which the Sanity Project white paper breaks down beautifully.
First, we have to define baseload reliability.
Right.
Baseload.
Baseload is the absolute minimum amount of continuous power a grid needs just to keep
society functioning 247.
Now, in a lot of countries, they're using natural gas as a bridge fuel to transition
away from burning coal because gas produces fewer emissions than coal.
But Canada doesn't really burn coal anymore.
Exactly.
Our grid is already mostly hydro and nuclear.
So the government's argument isn't about replacing coal.
Their argument is that natural gas is absolutely necessary for peak winter demand.
Yeah, when it's minus 30 degrees in February and the wind isn't blowing and millions of
new electric heat pumps all kick on at the exact same time, battery storage currently
just isn't cheap enough or advanced enough to hold the massive amounts of power needed
to prevent rolling blackouts.
Natural gas plants can be fired up on demand to fill that gap.
I understand the engineering logic there, but doesn't that still mean we are building
new fossil fuel infrastructure and locking in new carbon emissions for decades?
That totally validates the environmental critique.
It would, except for an unpublicized catch in the policy that completely changes the
long-term math.
Carbon‑Pricing ‘Squeeze’ and CER Changes
The government is adjusting the Clean Electricity Regulations, the CER.
Originally, those regulations mandated a very strict net-zero grid by 2035.
That requirement is being loosened in this new strategy, which is why environmentalists
are furious.
In fact, the CER is currently suspended entirely in Alberta.
So they are backing away from the climate targets?
Yes and no.
They are backing away from a hard ban, but the federal government is signing a deal to
attach a $130 per tonne carbon price to those natural gas emissions by the year 2040.
Oh, okay, so that is the mechanism.
Yes, that's the squeeze.
Natural gas is being included as a pragmatic bridge to keep the lights on during winter
peaks, but it comes with a massive rising financial penalty attached to it.
So the government isn't giving gas plants a free pass to pollute forever?
Not at all.
They are banking on the fact that by 2040, a $130 carbon tax will make firing up a gas
plant so insanely expensive that grid operators will naturally choose to dispatch battery
storage instead.
Assuming battery technology gets cheaper, of course, the economics are designed to eventually
force natural gas out of the market.
So it isn't coal-equivalent greenwashing.
But the critics are still totally correct that loosening those regulations today without
a binding replacement target place creates a credible immediate risk that we might blow
past our net zero targets.
Precisely.
It is a massive gamble on future market economics.
And for you listening right now, we would really love to know where you land on this
tension.
We are about a third of the way into this deep dive, and this is a perfect time to hear
from you.
Yeah.
Does natural gas belong in a clean energy strategy if it prevents rolling winter blackouts?
Or is any new fossil fuel infrastructure an unacceptable step backward?
Drop a comment below.
And while you're at it, hit the like button.
All right.
Let's move to the second major pushback.
Because even if we perfectly agree on what needs to be built, a mix of wind, solar, nuclear,
and heavily taxed natural gas, we hit a massive structural brick wall when we ask, who actually
has the power to build it?
Right.
So if natural gas is just a bridge fuel, and the federal government is trying to force
it out economically by 2040, who actually builds the bridge?
Because the last time I checked, the federal government in Ottawa doesn't actually own
the power lines.
Jurisdictional Roadblock — Provincial Grids
And that is exactly where the trillion dollar vision hits a constitutional reality check.
Electricity in Canada is entirely a provincial jurisdiction.
We do not have a national grid.
We have fragmented, siloed provincial grids that operate like highly defensive separate
islands.
Quebec's grid operates independently of Ontario's grid, which operates independently of Manitoba's.
It's wild.
I read in a newspaper that most Canadian provinces actually trade more electricity north to south
with the United States than they do east to west with their neighboring Canadian provinces.
It is wildly inefficient.
It costs the country billions of dollars in wasted power and redundant infrastructure
because provinces refuse to pool their resources.
But because electricity is constitutionally a provincial right, Prime Minister Carney
cannot just snap his fingers from Ottawa and order an interprovincial transmission line
to be built.
I have to bring up the political backlash here because this jurisdictional reality seems
to be exactly what conservative leader Pierre Poitlieu is tapping into with his critique
today.
Oh, for sure.
Yeah.
He held a press conference framing this entire federal strategy as a scheme to jack up consumer
power bills by 35 percent.
Which is an incredibly potent political talking point because it plays directly into very
real, very painful audience anxieties about the cost of living.
People are already struggling.
So telling them a new federal policy will spike their hydro bills by 35 percent is going
to cause immediate outrage.
But wait, if electricity is a provincial jurisdiction, how can a federal policy hike provincial hydro
rates by 35 percent?
Is he blaming the feds for something the provinces did?
According to the Sanity Project fact check, yes, the 35 percent claim is objectively misleading
because it completely conflates jurisdictions.
When Poitlieu warns of a 35 percent spike, he is pointing to massive hydro bill increases
we saw in places like Ontario over the last decade.
But those historical spikes were largely due to provincial government energy contracts
and what are called stranded costs.
Ah, stranded costs.
And stranded costs are basically when a province built a massive, expensive power plant, ends
up not needing all that power or mismanaging the contract, but the taxpayers still have
to pay off the mortgage on that plant through their hydro bills.
Exactly.
Those were provincial planning decisions and provincial mistakes, not federal clean electricity
policy.
Okay, I see.
But it's highly effective political messaging because the average voter doesn't distinguish
between federal and provincial energy jurisdiction when they open their monthly utility bill.
That makes total sense.
So if I can try an analogy here, the federal government announcing a $1 trillion strategy
to double the grid is essentially like offering to completely remodel and expand an entire
house.
But the provinces own the house, the provinces hold all the municipal permits, and the provinces
can simply lock the front door and refuse to let the federal contractors inside.
That is a brilliant way to picture it.
So the question becomes, how does PM Carney plan to bypass those locked provincial doors
if he doesn't have the constitutional authority to knock them down?
He has to use financial leverage, right?
Yeah.
Exactly.
The strategy outlines two main levers.
First, he is using the federal major projects office to try and fast track interprovincial
transmission lines, like the proposed North Coast transmission line out in BC.
They want to designate them as matters of national interest and national defense.
That's a bold move.
It is.
Federal Levers: Major Projects Office & AAA Financing
But the much bigger carrot is the federal balance sheet.
Ottawa is offering to use its AAA balance sheet to borrow the money required for this
bill.
Let's define that for a second.
A AAA balance sheet essentially means the federal government has the ultimate national
credit score.
They have the ability to borrow billions of dollars on the global market at the absolute
lowest interest rates on earth.
Rates that individual provinces or private utility companies simply cannot get.
Exactly.
So the federal government is essentially telling the provinces, look, we know you need to double
your grid for AI and industrial growth, but you can't afford it.
We will step in and secure the lowest interest rates in the world to finance this build.
So you don't have to shock your local voters with massive upfront rate hikes.
They are attempting to buy constitutional cooperation.
That's exactly it.
But securing the lowest interest rates in the world doesn't matter if there is no one
to actually build the transmission lines, which brings up the third and perhaps the
most fatal hole in this entire trillion dollar vision.
Yeah, the human element, right?
If the federal government is relying entirely on financial promises rather than constitutional
power, how solid is this strategy today?
This is where the skeptical view really solidifies.
Dale Bogan from the Canadian Climate Institute gave an interview this morning and he used
a very specific damning phrase.
He called the announcement a vision document, not a policy package.
Ouch.
Because there isn't actually any real money attached to it yet.
That is the first massive gap.
The government has promised to use their AAA balance sheet to finance this infrastructure,
but right now there is no binding budget allocation attached to this strategy.
Really?
Really?
Yeah.
It is a promise to spend money at some point in the future, not a legally binding budget
line today.
But honestly, the money isn't even the biggest problem.
The most glaring missing piece is the workforce.
I was wondering when we'd get to that.
The strategy explicitly states that Canada needs 130,000 highly skilled workers by 2050
to physically build this new grid.
And 30,000 of those workers are needed by 2028.
That's only two years away.
We are experiencing a massive global shortage of skilled trades right now.
I mean, it's hard enough to find a regular electrician to come to your house, let alone
thousands of specialized workers.
Every developed country on earth is trying to decarbonize and upgrade their grids at
the exact same time.
Exactly.
We're all fighting over the same limited pool.
We're fighting over high voltage linesmen, nuclear technicians, heavy equipment operators.
Finding 130,000 highly skilled workers is like trying to build the Hoover Dam 10 times
over.
The government acknowledges this in the document, to be fair.
They mention a $6 billion federal program called Team Canada Strong, designed to recruit
trades workers.
But is a marketing and recruitment push going to do anything if the actual mechanics of
training are broken?
That's the million dollar question, or I guess the $6 billion question.
Workforce Shortage — 130,000 Skilled Workers Needed
Right.
It takes four to five years to fully train and certify a high voltage linesman.
If the provincial trade schools, the community colleges, and the union apprenticeship pipelines
aren't heavily funded right now to handle a massive influx of thousands of new students,
those workers simply will not materialize.
They won't.
You can run all the recruitment ads you want on TV, but if the classrooms are physically
full and the apprenticeship pipelines are bottlenecked because there aren't enough master
electricians to train the apprentices, the entire trillion dollar infrastructure plan
just grinds to a halt.
So it's a bottleneck on top of a bottleneck.
Yeah.
And this leads us to the harsh reality of today's announcement.
Without a concrete, fully funded training pipeline established across all provinces,
without an actual binding budget allocation, and without a finalized replacement for the
suspended clean electricity regulations, this strategy is not a completed policy.
It's just an idea.
It is currently an incredibly ambitious thousand page wish list that has just been put out
for a four month public consultation.
Well, we have covered a tremendous amount of ground today.
We started with the undeniable verified math of soaring electricity demand driven by EVs,
heat punks, and sovereign AI data centers.
Yep.
And in fact, the fierce, highly polarized debate over whether natural gas is a pragmatic
bridge or a climate betrayal.
We looked at the jurisdictional nightmare of a fragmented provincial grid system.
And finally, the gaping holes in both the budget and the skilled workforce pipeline.
It is a massive amount of complex information to synthesize.
It really is.
And before we deliver our final verdict on what you, the listener, should actually take
away from this historic announcement, if you are finding this thorough, impartial breakdown
helpful in cutting through your social media feed today, please take a second to subscribe
to the show, drop a comment and leave a like.
It really helps us continue to do this kind of deep analytical work.
Yeah, let's bring it all together.
What is the final takeaway?
We are not going to leave this with a vague you decide conclusion.
Based strictly on the data and the sources we've reviewed, here is the definitive verdict
Final Verdict & Takeaway
on the Powering Canada Strong strategy.
First the good.
The ambition of this plan is entirely real, and it is absolutely necessary.
Without a doubt.
The demand drivers, the explosive growth of AI data centers, the transition to electric
vehicles and mass housing construction.
These are verified facts.
Canada's electrical grid must double in size by 2050.
If it doesn't, we will face catastrophic rolling blackouts and severe economic stagnation.
The math does not care about political ideology.
However, the gaps in today's announcement are just as real as the demand.
As of today, May 14th, 2026, this is a consultation paper masquerading as a finished policy.
It is a promise to borrow money without a binding budget.
It is a workforce plan that completely lacks the necessary fully funded training pipelines
to actually produce 130,000 workers.
And it is a natural gas strategy that relies on a future carbon tax mechanism while missing
a concrete immediate replacement for the suspended clean electricity regulations.
So what does this all mean for Canadians trying to make sense of the news today?
It means you should absolutely support the overarching direction of this strategy.
Yeah, the need is there.
The infrastructure demand is an undeniable reality and Canada is starting from an incredibly
advantageous position with an 80% clean, low cost grid.
But you must demand binding implementation specifics.
You must demand a real allocated budget and a finalized regulatory framework by the time
this consultation period ends in the fall of 2026.
A trillion dollar vision on paper is wonderful, but you cannot plug a toaster or a data center
into a vision.
You certainly cannot.
Thank you so much for joining us on this team dive.
If you want to read the source material for yourself, including the Full Sanity Project
white paper, the federal document and all the reporting we discussed today, head over
to blog.thesanity.org.
And I just want to leave you with one final, slightly provocative thought to chew on as
you go about your day.
Okay, let's hear it.
So we talked at length about how the federal government plans to use its AAA balance sheet,
which ultimately means taxpayer backed borrowing to finance this $1 trillion grid expansion.
And we also established that a massive driving chunk of that new electricity demand is coming
from highly profitable private AI data centers owned by foreign tech giants.
So the question is, who is really paying for the AI revolution?
If taxpayers are fronting the massive upfront costs to double the grid's capacity, will
everyday Canadians actually see their energy wallets shrink by 2050, like the government
promises?
Or will we all just end up subsidizing the cooling costs and energy bills of sovereign AI?
Definitely something to think about the next time you ask an AI to generate a picture of
a cat on a skateboard and boil a metaphorical cup of water.
Thanks for listening and we'll catch you next time.
That was Rachel Bennett and Michael Reeves examining the future of the Canadian electricity
grid and the trillion dollar transformation now being proposed.
For more deep dives, research breakdowns, and long form analysis, subscribe to this
podcast and visit thesanity.org.
See you in the next one.
If you want more facts and less fear, hit subscribe.
Check out the next breakdown wherever you're listening or watching.
Stay sane, Canada.
Thanks for listening.
I'm Michael Reeves.
I'll see you next time.
Take care.
Amazon Music
Apple Podcasts
Podcast Addict
Spotify
YouTube