Why Canadian Greenhouses Are Sending Our Vegetables to the U.S.

0:01 A Canadian greenhouse just grew a record harvest in the middle of a blizzard,

0:05 and somehow there's less homegrown food on your plate than there was

0:09 7 years ago.

0:13 I'm Abby Inglewood, and this is The Sanity Project. This is

0:17 part 1 of a 3-part investigation into Canadian vegetable resilience,

0:21 what this country can actually grow, and why so little of it stays here.

0:25 Canada's greenhouse sector is up nearly 38% in 5 years.

0:29 By every headline number, we're growing more food than ever.

0:33 And yet the amount that actually stays here, per person, just hit

0:36 a 7-year low. Some people look at that and point to the Netherlands,

0:40 a country you could drive across in an afternoon, and ask why we

0:44 don't just copy them. The real answer is buried in a system most Canadians have

0:47 never heard of, one running alongside factories nobody would call farms.

0:52 And there's a number about growing food indoors in a Canadian winter that should

0:55 genuinely alarm you. Let's get into it.

1:00 So picture this, you're on, you know, your last winter grocery

1:05 run right in the dead of February here in Canada. So hot this time of

1:08 year, right? You're freezing. Mm-hmm. You walk down the produce aisle shivering

1:11 a little bit and, and you grab a pack of beautiful bright red tomatoes

1:16 and you check the label and it says grown in Ontario, which honestly feels

1:20 like a minor miracle when there's a literal blizzard outside.

1:24 Exactly. But then you pivot, you pick up a head of lettuce

1:27 or maybe like a bag of cauliflower, and there's that inevitable sticker imported

1:31 from California or, you know, imported from Mexico. Yeah, it's always there.

1:35 It is. And looking at those 2 items side by side, you kind of have

1:38 to wonder, like, if Canada has the advanced agricultural tech to grow pristine

1:42 tomatoes indoors during a freezing winter, why on

1:45 earth are we still so heavily dependent on international supply chains for almost

1:48 everything else? Right. I mean, it is basically the defining paradox of Canadian

1:53 agriculture today. We possess this immense, you know,

1:57 world-class technological capacity to grow food in really harsh

2:01 climates, yet our supermarket shelves are just

2:05 fundamentally tethered to the Southern Hemisphere. Yeah. And the US,

2:08 obviously, just to keep the country fed. Which is exactly why we're tackling this head-on.

2:12 So welcome to part 1 of a special 3-part deep dive into Canadian

2:16 vegetable resilience. Our core mission today is unpacking

2:20 this massive disconnect between what Canada's ag sector can actually

2:23 produce and what ultimately ends up on your dinner table. Yeah.

2:27 And just to give you a sense of where we're heading with this whole series,

2:29 today is really all about the market maze, right? Production capacity versus domestic

2:33 availability. Right. Then part 2, we're going to crack open the massive winter energy

2:37 bill that's required to actually keep these Canadian greenhouses warm. And finally, in part

2:40 3, we'll get into the long-term policy and institutional changes that we'd

2:44 actually need to fix this fragmented system. Awesome. And hey,

2:47 before we really pull on this thread, I just want to drop a quick call

2:49 to action for you. If you're as fascinated by, you know, the hidden mechanics of

2:53 how food gets to your plate as we are, head over to thesanity.org to comment,

2:57 like, and subscribe. Yeah, your questions and comments actively shape what we investigate,

3:00 so definitely get involved. Please do join the ongoing investigation. Yeah.

Baseline Data: Greenhouse boom and production stats

3:04 So, okay, listen, let's start with the baseline data here, because to understand why

3:08 you're eating imported lettuce, we kind of have to look at what Canada is

3:11 actually growing. I was digging into the recent economic reports from

3:15 Farm Credit Canada, the FCC, and our domestic greenhouse

3:18 sector is just undergoing an absolute boom. It's staggering, really.

3:22 The growth curve is just, I mean, between 2020 and 2025,

3:26 greenhouse vegetable production surged by nearly 38%.

3:29 Wow. 38%. Yeah, we hit 944,000 tons.

3:34 So to put that in perspective, nearly 3 out of every 10 fresh vegetables

3:38 produced in Canada now originate in a greenhouse. We're talking actual mountains of cucumbers,

3:42 tomatoes, bell peppers. Okay, but here's the thing.

3:46 We're investigating a food resilience problem. If you just look at that top-line

3:50 production number, you'd assume we were living in some, like, golden age

3:53 of domestic food security. But the latest numbers from Statistics Canada

3:57 show something incredibly counterintuitive. Oh, for sure. Right, like,

4:00 in 2025, Canada saw a 6.4% jump in

4:04 field vegetable production, pushing us over 2.5 million

4:08 tons. So we are objectively producing way more

4:11 fresh vegetables across the board. Right. However, the domestic availability

4:15 of fresh vegetables for Canadians, meaning like the actual volume of food that stays in

4:19 the country for you to buy and eat, that fell to 61.8 kilograms per

4:23 person. And that 2025 drop, that actually marks the 7th consecutive

4:27 year of decline in domestic availability per person. Wait, okay, I need

4:30 to challenge the logic of this because the whole core justification for heavily

4:34 subsidizing the Canadian greenhouse industry with tax dollars is You know, to boost our winter

4:38 resilience. How is it economically viable or even logically

4:42 sound that we're growing record amounts of food, but there's literally less of

4:46 it available for Canadians to eat? I mean, the short answer is the United States

Exports: How the U.S. market drains Canadian produce

4:49 export market. Oh, of course. Yeah. Our ag system

4:52 doesn't operate in a national vacuum, right? It's deeply integrated into North

4:56 American supply chains. The FCC data shows that Canadian greenhouse

5:00 exports to the US surged 44%, hitting $2.3 billion

5:05 in 2025. So, production simply does not

5:08 equal domestic availability. Okay, so it's, it's like your neighborhood baker

5:12 making the best bread in the world but shipping it all to the next town

5:16 over because they pay double, leaving you to just buy imported bread.

5:19 Exactly, that's a great way to put it. But wait, aren't greenhouses supposed to feed

5:22 us in the winter? Well, they do, they absolutely do feed Canadians in the winter.

5:26 But in the summer and early fall, when Canadian field vegetables, you know, the ones

5:30 grown outdoors in the dirt, are finally ready for harvest, things shift.

5:34 When that massive volume of cheap field produce hits local grocery stores,

5:38 domestic buyers naturally want to pay less. Right, because supply is super high.

5:42 Exactly. But the greenhouse operators, they still have to cover the massive

5:46 overhead of their high-tech facilities. So, the wholesale price the farmer gets,

5:50 before transport and grocery markups— what economists call the farmgate price—

5:54 that becomes the friction point. Precisely. The farmgate prices for greenhouse

5:57 tomatoes and peppers, need to stay relatively high to turn a profit.

6:01 So when Canadian grocers pivot to buying cheap local field crops,

6:05 the greenhouse growers pivot to the US export market. Because the US buyers will

6:09 pay more. Yeah, buyers on long-term contracts down there are willing to pay a premium

6:13 for consistent, high-quality, pristine greenhouse produce.

6:18 From a business standpoint, it just keeps the sector solvent. But from a national food

6:21 security standpoint, it exposes a huge flaw in how we measure resilience,

6:26 You know, we can't just assume that building more greenhouses automatically equals

6:29 more food on a Canadian plate. Man, that's wild. So, since we know

6:33 these greenhouses are logically chasing American dollars to survive the summer,

6:36 it kind of forces us to ask, can we outbuild the export drain?

Dutch Comparison: Why the Netherlands model is tempting

6:40 Like, a lot of people point to the world's most famous agricultural overachiever,

6:43 the Netherlands, and say, you know, why not just cover the country in glass?

6:47 Ah, right, the Dutch test. The Dutch test. It is arguably

6:51 the most common comparison made in Canadian ag policy debates. In fact,

6:55 it's actually the central focus of a comprehensive white paper by the Sanity Project Research

7:00 Desk that we're using to anchor today's deep dive. Yeah, and looking at the data

7:03 from Statistics Netherlands, you can absolutely see why people want to copy them.

7:06 I mean, the Netherlands is geographically tiny. You could drive across the entire country in

7:10 a few hours. Yet in 2025, they produced an unbelievable

7:14 5.91 billion kilograms of vegetables. It's crazy.

7:18 And 1.86 billion kilograms of that was grown strictly under glass.

7:22 That means their underglass output alone is more than double Canada's

7:26 entire greenhouse production. So if they can do it,

7:30 why can't we? We have millions of acres of available land. Can't we just copy

7:33 the Dutch model and, like, cover the country in glass? Well, that is exactly

7:36 the premise that the Sanity Project white paper argues is fundamentally flawed.

7:40 Really? Why? Because the Dutch didn't just build glass houses on

7:43 empty fields. They engineered an integrated,

7:47 hyperdense industrial ecosystem. If you look

7:51 at the research coming out of Wageningen University over there, they detail

7:54 how these facilities actually operate. It's not just about the building,

7:58 it's about the circular resources surrounding it. Okay,

Dutch Ecosystem: Circular resources and industrial integration

8:01 what, what does a circular resource look like in practice for

8:04 a greenhouse? Well, it means capturing waste streams from other industries and feeding

8:08 them to the plants. So for instance, a Dutch greenhouse might

8:12 be strategically located right next to a fertilizer plant or some industrial

8:16 manufacturer, and they literally pipe the waste CO2 emissions from that factory directly

8:20 into the greenhouse. Wait, really? Just straight in? Straight in. Because plants, of course,

8:24 breathe CO2. By artificially raising the CO2 levels inside the

8:28 glasshouse, they supercharge plant respiration and drastically increase the

8:31 crop yield. Plus, they pipe in hot water from industrial cooling towers to heat

8:35 the greenhouses during winter. Okay, that completely changes the

8:38 definition of a greenhouse for me. We tend to think of them as

8:42 these, like, quaint standalone glass barns on the edge of a

8:45 farm. But what you're describing is closer to a petrochemical refinery.

8:49 It's like a node in an industrial grid. That is the perfect way to look

8:52 at it. And they also benefit from having specialized greenhouse construction companies,

8:57 advanced seed genetics labs, and specialized logistics all sitting within

9:00 just a few dozen kilometers of each other. And crucially, they have a highly

9:04 concentrated affluent market of hundreds of millions of European consumers

9:08 right next door. The transportation distances are basically negligible.

9:12 Which brings us to Canada's structural reality. Our geography is,

9:16 uh, the exact opposite of the Netherlands. Exactly. Over 72%

9:20 of Canada's greenhouse production is heavily concentrated in Southern Ontario.

9:24 So building a highly efficient Dutch-style greenhouse ecosystem in Leamington,

9:28 Ontario does absolutely nothing to solve fresh food access in Nunavut or Northern

9:32 Manitoba or rural communities in the Maritimes. Right, because you can't exactly pipe

9:37 waste heat across a continent. Exactly. And trucking

9:40 fragile produce thousands of kilometers, it degrades the quality and skyrockets

9:44 the price. Well, let me bring in a reader comment that actually touches directly on

9:47 this idea of regional expansion. Yeah. A listener was asking if interprovincial

9:51 trade barriers are the real roadblock here. They pointed to the booming

9:55 Newfoundland cucumber industry as proof that, you know, if we just remove the red

9:59 tape, local greenhouses can thrive literally anywhere in Canada.

Geography Reality Check: Why regional expansion myths fail

10:02 Yeah, it's a great audience question because interprovincial trade barriers are admittedly

10:06 a massive headache for the Canadian economy. However, we do have

10:10 to fact-check the specific premise here using data from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,

10:14 the Newfoundland cucumber boom is a total myth. Really? The data just doesn't back it

10:19 up? Not even close. In 2025, Newfoundland and Labrador's entire greenhouse vegetable farmgate

10:23 value was a mere $178,000. Wow,

10:27 that's, that's nothing. Yeah, and their greenhouse vegetable exports were

10:30 literally rounded to zero. You cannot dismantle geographic reality

10:34 with deregulation. Canada's extreme winter climate and our

10:37 vastly dispersed population mean a one-size-fits-all Dutch rollout is

10:41 structurally impossible. We can adopt their automation, sure, and their crop genetics,

10:46 but we cannot copy their geography. Okay, fair enough. But if we can't

10:49 build massive Dutch greenhouse clusters in every province because of the cold and

10:53 the sheer distance, what about moving agriculture completely indoors?

Indoor Farming: Vertical farms and urban agriculture

10:57 Like, bringing the farms directly into the urban centers where the people actually live?

11:00 Ah, so you're shifting the conversation from greenhouses, which obviously still rely heavily on

11:05 the sun, to indoor vertical farming, which is a completely closed environment.

11:08 Exactly. And this brings up another highly upvoted social media comment that

11:12 the Sanity Project white paper specifically investigated. So there

11:16 was this viral claim circulating that a massive abandoned shopping mall in

11:20 Montreal had been completely converted into a sprawling indoor vegetable

11:24 farm. Mm-hmm. And I mean, it sounds like the ultimate urban renewal fantasy. It does.

Urban Case Studies: Rooftop greenhouses and Goodleaf

11:28 But the white paper clarifies that this specific claim about an abandoned

11:32 Montreal mall is unverified. There's just no authoritative

11:35 record of a dead retail mall being converted into a massive ag facility there.

11:39 However, rumors like this usually stem from seeds of truth, and Montreal actually

11:43 is a global leader in urban agriculture. Okay, so what is

11:47 actually happening on the ground there then, if not the mall? Well, you have companies

11:50 like Lufa Farms operating highly successful commercial greenhouses on top of

11:54 industrial rooftops. And more to the point of vertical farming,

11:57 Goodleaf Farms recently completed a massive 96,000-square-foot vertical

12:02 farm in Saint-Paul, which is just outside Montreal. They're producing over 2

12:06 million pounds of leafy greens annually, like micro radish, baby spinach,

12:09 arugula. Wait, 2 million pounds indoors? How does a system

12:13 like that even function at that scale without soil? They utilize advanced

12:17 closed-loop hydroponics. So the plants sit in trays,

12:20 and nutrient-rich water is continuously recirculated across their

12:24 roots. And because the water is captured,

12:27 sterilized with UV light, and reused rather than just evaporating

12:30 into the open air or draining into the dirt, Good Leaf uses

12:34 95% less water than a traditional outdoor farm. That's incredible.

12:38 Yeah, and they provide all the photosynthesis using specialized agricultural LED

12:43 lights that mimic the specific spectrum of the spring sun. Okay, so if Good

12:46 Leaf is succeeding wildly at 96,000 square feet, I have to go

12:50 back to the mall idea. Why not just buy up every dying strip mall and

12:53 department store in Canada and fill them with hydroponic lettuce? Yeah, I mean, you already

12:56 have the building footprint, the loading docks, the urban location.

12:59 It sounds like the perfect real estate play, right? It sounds brilliant until

13:03 you look at the underlying mechanics of what a retail building is actually engineered to

13:06 handle. A shopping mall was built for people and retail displays.

13:10 It was decidedly not built to handle the latent heat of vaporization from

13:13 hundreds of thousands of transpiring plants. Meaning, like, the sheer amount of

13:17 moisture the plants are sweating into the air? Yes,

13:20 exactly. If you start pumping thousands of gallons of water and introducing

13:24 80% humidity into a structure built for an Orange Julius and a food court,

13:29 you are going to get catastrophic mold, rot, and structural failure within months.

Retrofit Limits: Why malls don’t make easy farms

13:34 Oh wow, I didn't even think about that. Yeah, plus the floors aren't reinforced

13:37 to hold the massive weight of multi-level water racks and the

13:40 standard commercial HVAC systems. They would instantly fail trying to

13:44 exhaust the intense heat generated by thousands of agricultural LEDs running 16

13:48 hours a day. Retrofitting a mall with industrial waterproofing,

13:52 agricultural drainage, and food safety systems is almost always way more expensive than

13:55 just pouring concrete for a purpose-built facility. Man, that structural reality makes a lot

14:00 of sense. Yeah. But even if you build a perfect custom facility,

14:03 there is a much larger hidden cost to vertical farming, isn't there? Like the energy

14:07 bill? Oh, the energy math is the ultimate reality check for indoor agriculture.

Energy Math: Field vs greenhouse vs vertical farms

14:11 And to understand this, we really have to look at some eye-opening data published

14:15 in the journal NPJ Sustainable Agriculture.

14:18 They measured the embedded energy required to grow 1 single kilogram of

14:22 produce across different farming methods. Okay, break the numbers down for us.

14:25 What's the baseline? So growing crops in an open dirt field takes about

14:29 1 megajoule of energy per kilogram. Okay, 1 megajoule,

14:33 got it. Now if you move that crop into a glass greenhouse, you now have

14:37 to heat it during the winter and run basic circulation fans. The energy requirement jumps

14:41 to about 27 megajoules per kilogram. Okay, 27, that is a significant

14:45 jump, but I guess the trade-off is year-round production in a frozen country. So it

14:48 makes sense. But what happens when you move into a completely windowless vertical

14:52 plant factory? You are now responsible for providing 100% of the

14:56 light artificially, plus intense cooling, heating, and dehumidification.

15:00 The energy requirement jumps to a median of 127 megajoules per kilogram.

15:05 127 megajoules. Just to put that in perspective for you listening,

15:09 127 megajoules is roughly the equivalent energy of running a

15:13 standard microwave on high constantly for about 35 straight hours just

15:17 to grow 2 pounds of food. That's insane. It is. And the math gets even

15:21 more extreme depending on the geography. For insulated container farms operating in

15:25 the extreme cold of the Canadian Arctic, that number skyrockets to

15:29 6,000 megajoules per kilogram just to keep the

15:33 ambient temperature warm enough for the plants to even survive. 6,000 megajoules.

15:36 Yeah, that completely shatters the illusion that indoor farming is a magic bullet for

15:40 every crop. It really does. What this energy data tells us is that

15:43 vertical farms work beautifully for lightweight, fast-growing crops that don't

15:47 need massive amounts of light energy to create physical mass. You know, leafy greens,

15:50 microgreens, herbs. But windowless vertical farms are an expensive,

15:54 energy-guzzling nightmare for heavy fruiting crops like tomatoes,

15:57 cucumbers, or root vegetables. Because, I mean, growing a leafy

16:01 green is essentially a sprint, right? It's quick, requires low energy, and you're

16:05 just growing the leaf. But a tomato is a marathon. The plant has to build

16:09 a massive infrastructure of vines, flowers, and then pump

16:12 water and complex sugars into heavy fruit against gravity over the course of months.

16:16 Doing that entirely under artificial light is an astronomical waste of

16:20 electricity. Exactly. The physics simply do not support growing vine crops in a

16:24 windowless room. Okay, so we've established that our greenhouses

The Missing Middle: Processing, storage, and supply-chain disconnect

16:27 bleed produce to the U.S. export market to survive the summer.

16:31 The Dutch model doesn't fit our vast geography. And urban vertical farms

16:35 are energy hogs that can really only grow specialized lettuce.

16:38 How does Canada actually solve its reliance on imported vegetables? This is where we

16:43 have to look at what industry experts call the missing middle, specifically, our processing capacity.

16:47 The missing middle. Yeah, I found a statistic in the National Food Security Strategy that

16:50 absolutely floored me regarding this. It noted that Canada exports $724

16:55 million in fresh tomatoes every year, but we turn around and

16:58 import $511 million in processed tomato products. Like, we are literally

17:02 loading our fresh food onto trucks, shipping it to factories in

17:06 places like Ohio to be crushed into pasta sauce and canned, and then buying it

17:10 back at a premium. Yep, it is the perfect illustration of a disconnected

17:14 supply chain. The verdict of this deep dive, the main takeaway

Synthesis: The problem lives in the spreadsheet

17:17 synthesizing all of these sources, is that Canada's core problem is not simply

17:21 that it cannot grow enough vegetables. The problem is that our production our pricing,

17:25 our transportation, our grocery procurement, and our domestic availability are

17:29 completely disconnected from one another. They just don't operate as a coherent national system.

17:33 So the vulnerability isn't necessarily in the soil or the technology,

17:37 it's in the spreadsheet. Our supply chain is optimized for the absolute

17:41 lowest quarterly cost, which just severs the domestic connection the

17:44 moment the weather changes or border opens. If total self-sufficiency is

17:48 a myth, what are we actually aiming for here? Well, the white paper

17:52 defines the realistic goal as strategic vegetable resilience.

17:55 It's not about stubbornly trying to grow 100% of everything. It's about

17:59 building a layered complementary system. And there are 4 distinct

18:03 layers to making this work. Okay, let's examine those layers. What is the foundation?

Solution Framework — Layer 1: Outdoor agriculture & storage

18:07 Layer 1 is outdoor agriculture and storage. We need to keep growing

18:11 heavy, calorically dense crops like potatoes, carrots, and onions in the field where

18:15 the energy cost remains at that baseline line of 1 megajoule per kilogram.

18:19 But the Critical Pivot is investing heavily in modern controlled atmosphere cold storage

18:24 and regional processing hubs. And just to clarify, controlled atmosphere storage isn't

18:28 just like a giant fridge, right? No, it's highly advanced. They seal the room and

18:32 scrub the oxygen and ethylene gas out of the air, essentially putting the produce

18:35 to sleep. It means the cabbage or apples harvested in August are still crisp and

18:40 feeding Canadians in February, instead of rotting in a standard warehouse or

18:43 being shipped to the U.S. for canning. Right. Okay, layer 2. Layer 2 focuses on

18:47 our large commercial greenhouses. We absolutely keep expanding these

18:51 in agricultural hubs like Ontario and BC, focusing on the

18:54 heavy vine crops— tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers. But to fix

18:58 the export drain, we need a complete overhaul of grocery procurement.

19:01 We need Canadian grocery chains to sign year-round volume

19:05 commitments with domestic growers rather than just ditching them the second Mexican field

19:09 crops become temporarily cheaper. Right. Provide the financial stability so

19:12 the food actually stays here. Yeah, that makes sense. What is Layer 3? Layer 3

19:16 is the strategic use of vertical farms. We locate them near major urban

19:20 centers, like that Goodleaf facility in Montreal. But we restrict their use

19:24 specifically to highly perishable leafy greens and herbs.

19:28 These crops benefit massively from hyperlocal distribution because they wilt quickly,

19:32 and they don't require the massive light energy needed to fruit.

19:35 We keep the lettuce out of the diesel trucks crossing the continent. And the final

19:38 layer, Layer 4? Layer 4 is regional and northern production.

19:43 The federal government recently launched a $100 million local

19:46 food pathway to build smaller, subsidized agricultural hubs

19:49 for remote communities. You don't evaluate the economics of a northern

19:53 container farm against a massive, efficient greenhouse in Ontario.

19:57 You evaluate it against the staggering reality of air freight. Right, the alternative.

20:01 Exactly. When it costs $15 just to fly a single wilted head of

20:05 lettuce into Nunavut, suddenly the high energy cost of a subsidized container farm

20:09 makes profound economic and social sense. It's a completely different

20:13 economic equation based on geography. That is a massive paradigm shift.

20:17 You know, a resilient food system doesn't mean building a magical glass dome

20:21 over the entire country, and it doesn't mean outlawing imports. It means disciplined

20:25 matching, using the right building, the right energy source, and the right crop for

20:29 the specific region. Imports are always going to fill the gaps in a northern climate,

20:32 and that's perfectly fine. But international trade should be a strategic choice,

20:37 not an absolute necessity for survival. That is the exact essence of

20:41 food resilience. Well, as a reminder, this was only part 1 of our series.

What’s Next: Parts 2 & 3 and closing call to action

20:45 In part 2, we are going to look at the other side of this agricultural

20:48 coin: the massive winter energy bill required to keep all these high-tech Canadian

20:53 greenhouses warm when it's 30 below outside. And in part 3,

20:56 we'll explore the institutional and policy changes needed to actually fix

20:59 this disconnected procurement system. Before we go, a quick

21:02 reminder: head over to thesanity.org to comment, like, and subscribe. Your engagement literally

21:07 drives the research. And I want to leave you with a final thought to mull

21:10 over the next time you're standing in that produce aisle looking at labels.

21:14 Think about the hidden energy miles embedded in the food on your plate.

21:18 Is a head of field-grown lettuce, trucked thousands of

21:21 miles burning diesel all the way from California, actually more

21:25 or less environmentally friendly than a hyper-local lettuce grown in a high-energy

21:29 Canadian vertical farm in the dead of winter. Oh wow, it really changes how

21:33 you look at a simple salad. Follow for more fact checks that cut through the

21:35 noise. What stays

21:40 with me is that this problem lives in a spreadsheet, not in the soil.

21:44 Canada has the land, the technology, and the harvest.

21:47 What it doesn't have yet is a system connecting any of it back to your

21:50 kitchen. Next time, we dig into the winter energy bill

21:54 hiding behind every one of those greenhouse tomatoes. If this changed

21:58 how you look at what's on your plate, subscribe to The Sanity Project and share

22:02 it with someone who still wants the real numbers instead of the easy story.

22:06 See you next time. If you want more facts and less fear,

22:10 hit subscribe. Check out the next breakdown wherever you're

22:14 listening or watching. Stay sane,